Metodika Lichnostnogo Differenciala Klyuch

The authors ground the necessity to clarify the terminological and phenomenological specifics of the terms: “self-fulfillment”, “personal development”, “self-development”. The attention is drawn to the formal usage of these terms in the pedagogical science and the ambiguous interpretations by different scientific schools of psychology. The research of the manifestation of self-fulfillment and personal development is performed based on a selection of 126 teenagers, engaging the “Personal growth” scales from the methods of psychological well-being by C. Ryff, the “Personal growth” scales from the methods of “Life aspirations” by E.Deci, R.Ryan, as well as the author’s method of directivity to self-fulfillment and method to reveal the significance by V.Y, Kotlyakov. For the first time the authors’ questionnaire to measure the self-development in different life spheres is employed. The analysis of the empirical results allows to make a grounded statement that the contemporary teenagers have a prevailing egocentric directivity of self-fulfillment and reveals as well the importance of the interest to the moral aspects of being and the interiorized values of personal growth for the harmonious self-fulfillment of the teenager.

Golovanova N.F., Dermanova I.B. 10-52 code Vozrastnye osobennosti motivatsii samorazvitiya [The age-related specifics of motivation of self-development]. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii “ Anan'evskie chteniya — 2017: Preemstvennost' v psikhologicheskoi nauke: V.M. Bekhterev, B.G. Anan'ev, B.F. Saint.Petersburg, 24—26 oktyabrya 2017g.) [Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference “Anan’ev Readings — 2017: the continuity in the psychological science: V.M.

Bekhterev, B.G. Anan'ev, B.F. Saint.Petersburg: Aising, 2017, pp.

Vestnik MGSU 2015/5 DOI: 10.-0935.2015.5. Articles count - 18. Pages - 149 «Task» for the vacation (On the importance of raising the quality of the scientific content).

Sochineniya v chetyireh tomah. – M.: Myisl, 1983.

• Vernadskiy V. Nauchnaya myisl kak planetarnoe yavlenie.

– M.: Nauka, 1991. • Veselovskiy A. Istoricheskaya poetika. – M.: Vyisshaya shkola, 1989.

• Goldberg R. Iskusstvo performansa. Ot futurizma do nashih dney. – M.: Ad Marginem, 2015. • Dokuchaev I. Tsennost i ekzistentsiya. – SPb.: Nauka, 2009.

• Dokuchaev I. Globalnyiy performans: konturyi kulturyi XXI ve-ka // Voprosyi kulturologii. – M.: Rarog'; Moskovskiy rabochiy, 1993. Analitika chelovecheskogo byitiya: Vvedenie v opyit samo-poznaniya. Sistematicheskiy ocherk. – M.: Infra-M, 2014. [ ] [ 838 Kb] Gennady VYZHLETSOV Saint Petersburg State University, Russia Department of Philosophy, Chair of Ontology and Theory of Knowledge Professor, Doctor of Science (Philosophy) Axiology of Culture at the Turn of the Centuries The article is devoted to analysis of formation and development of the ontological axiology of culture at the turn of the XIX – XX and XX – XXI centuries.

On the first turn the philosophy of values has received the name «axiology» (1902) and the place in the system of philosophy (1907 – 1909.). Testi po tehnologii mashinostroeniya s otvetami. In this classic period (1890s – 1930s) H.

Differenciala

Scheler and N. Hartmann create a framework of values of «Kulturphilosophie». They introduce the basic categories: spirit, values, people and culture. Russian religious philosophy, spiritually and valuable in its content, develops them on the basis of features of Russian philosophy and culture. The result of all the classical period becomes the ontological axiology of N.O.Lossky (1931), opposing the absolutism and axiological relativism. Modern post-non-classical period (1970s – 2010s) is different to axiological relativism. It removes the difference between the value of opposites, and values are swapped with their opposites: «the good turns «evil», «beautiful» turns «ugly», turning the culture into its opposite.

Modern ontological «axiology of culture» (1996) proves the objectivity of cultural values by transcendence of their source. It is spiritual and energy potential of the infinite universe life, briefly referred to as «Spirit». The value therefore is the truth of the spirit and sustenance of culture as the creator and the creation by man. Axiology of culture, being the basis of modern humanitarian knowledge in general, is based on rationality as the effective activity of the mind. Key words: axiology, spirit, value, people, culture, philosophy, ontology, truth, mind, absolutism, transcendence, relativism.

• Alekseev P.V. Filosofyi Rossii XIX-HH stoletiy, Biografii, idei, tru-dyi. 4-e izd., per.

M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2002. • Berdyaev N.A.

Filosofiya tvorchestva, kulturyi i iskusstva. M.: Iskusstvo, 1994. • Chernyih V.Yu. Aksiologiya istorii Rossii: sovremennaya otechestvennaya istoriya v svete teorii tsennostey/ Permskaya gos. • Dokuchaev I.I.